Name of Federalism and Key Figures
|
States or Federal Government
|
Key Cases
|
Explanation of change theme
|
Any other relevant information
|
Dual Federalism / layer cake federalism
|
State – everything apart from foreign and interstate affairs
|
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)gave
states the permission to enforce segregation laws/Jim Crow if they wished
|
The Supreme Court struck down laws passed by Congress to regulate
business & working conditions – the Supreme Court deemed this
unconstitutional and these laws only applied to inter-state commerce
|
‘the power of states over local matters may be eliminated and…our
system of government destroyed’
|
Co-Operative Federalism – the new
relationship of co-operative federalism was more like two different mixtures contributing to marble
cake federalism
|
Federal Government
|
Wall Street Crash – the Great Depression, 1929
New Deal – provided financial help for the
unemployed
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. US (1935)
Regulated all companies including local trade, which was state responsibility
US v. Butler (1936) the court
ruled the Agricultural Adjustment Act was unconstitutional as it interfered
with state responsibility
|
The federal government rose to take responsibility for local schools,
work/unemployment benefits – which was a major departure from traditional
federalism
|
The New Deal destroyed Federalism.
Co-Operative federalism continued because the government needed to
control the economy during WWII and after to take care of the aftermath of
those who served & were wounded by war.
During the Cold War, the US was a major technological player in arms
and provided a vast array of jobs in the economy. Federal government rose as the key player, taking away state
power.
|
Johnson and Creative Federalism
|
Federal government
|
Great Society – aimed to alleviate poverty; only federal government would have the resources for such a large
programme that would take significant commitment in areas including;
healthcare for the elderly, inner city unemployment, housing, education, transport
Gideon v Wainwright (1963) – defendants
were entitled to a lawyer even if they couldn’t afford it, due to the 6th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) – suspects
had to be informed of their rights to not incriminate themselves (silence), 5th Amendment
|
-Direct federal support; block grants changed
the nature of federalism
-Financial support for local government bypassing state government; constitutionally, the local government is accountable to state government which changed the dynamic of federalism completely.
-Categorical grants; given for specific purposes – the
state couldn’t put the money to any other use
|
Federal government dictating how money was spent by states changed the
nature of Federalism
Effects of Great Society – the amount
of money spent by federal government on welfare for citizens rose
dramatically
|
Nixon and New Federalism
|
State government
|
Nixon attempted to bring back federalism in its purest form. Nixon
attempted to reverse the effects of the Great Society which he believed
completely destroyed federalism.
Roe v Wade (1973) Texas law
that restricted abortion was struck down, due to the 9th Amendment
which protects the rights other than those stated in the Constitution.
Any state law which made abortion illegal was an unjustifiable
intrusion by the Government on the privacy of the individual
|
Whilst Nixon attempted to pass the federal power down to the states,
the Supreme Court continued to insist on Federal standards being
applied to state laws and actions
|
General Revenue Sharing – categorical
grants replaced by block grants for states to spend
|
Reagan and New Federalism
|
State government
|
-Issued Executive Order to favour the interests of the states
over federal government when policy making
-By reducing federal aid to states, he broke dependency culture
(reducing $18billion)
-Instead of federal & state government sharing responsibility, the
states would take FULL responsibility of 2/3 programmes (Medicaid,
welfare/food stamps) and federal government would be responsible for the
third. This was known as SWAPS – and whilst this seemed a feasible proposal,
the states simply couldn’t afford such a programme
|
Appointed Anthony Kennedy who shared the view that the judiciary
should restrain Congress in interfering with in state affairs/problems
|
Government is not the solution to our problems, government is the
problem
|
Clinton and New Federalism
|
State government
|
Clinton felt, as a previous governor, states should have freedom to
decide what was best for states, which was enhanced by the growing
professionalism state governments possessed.
US v. Lopez (1995) – Congress
had exceeded powers when it passed banning firearms near schools; this could
only be passed by states;
Printz v. US (1997) – background
checks could not be enforced by Congress as this was for states to instruct
|
1960s: local/state electors declined, as most wanted to be in
Washington.
1990s: this reversed and state politicians cooperated with one another
Economic boom leading to an increase in tax revenues for states and
less reliance on Federal government income
|
|
George W Bush and New Federalism
|
State government
|
Fiscal conservative agenda; if taxes were cut national government
would be forced to do less & people would rely on their own resources. Starving
the Beast would strengthen state governments and ensure personal
responsibility
|
-9/11 federal government was given additional funds to spent on
reconstruction of New York City; new government department set up for Homeland
Security
INTERVENTIONIST INSTINCTS:
-Medicare – improved healthcare for the elderly
-No Child Left Behind – federal government’s contribution
to the cost of education. Introduced the federal system of accountability
for schools not meeting English, Maths, Science criteria
-Hurricane Katrina: serious damage to New Orleans – Bush
committed to rebuild the city
|
|
Obama and Federalism
|
Federal government
|
US v. Windsor (2013) – against
Congress, struck down the part of DOMA that prohibited federal benefits to
homosexual couples
Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) – refused to hear case on same sex marriage, which reinstated same sex
marriage in California.
Fisher v Texas (2013) – voided the
Grutter decision and made Affirmative Action unconstitutional in Texas, in
favour of the state
Shelby
County v. Holder – invalidated Section 4b of the Voting
Rights Act; permitting the states to decide their own voting procedures. This was
a win for the ANTI-FEDERALISTS!!!
National
Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius – that
insurance exchanges under Obamacare were unconstitutional as they didn’t have
the individual mandates to force the states in providing healthcare insurance. Congress
couldn’t collect taxes under the Commerce Clause, making the coercion of states
to buy healthcare insurance completely unconstitutional
|
Obamacare – Affordable Care Act meant that the federal government was
maintaining the role of the state by paying for welfare
Obama Stimulus Package – economy was in absolute shambles, collapse of
the Lehman Brothers.
|
Friday, 20 March 2015
Federalism...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey, any idea of where Trump's federalism approach falls?
ReplyDelete