The Executive
Office of the President
Direct & coordinate the federal bureaucracy; created by the 1939 Reorganisation Act
Direct & coordinate the federal bureaucracy; created by the 1939 Reorganisation Act
Advisers:
Provide
information and analysis of the key issues facing the administration
Providing
guidance in specialist policy areas
Evaluating
political/legal significance of presidential decisions
Writing
speeches/presenting the President’s view to the public
Liaising
with Congress to gain support for the President’s programmes
Filtering
out who can get presidential access
Monitoring
work of the executive department and agencies, ensuring they are carrying out
the political agenda
Positives
of the EXOP…
Beneficial
to the Head of Government to have complete confidence in the closest advisors
and to be certain everything in the administrations political agenda is
implemented.
Power in Washington is measured by access to
the President, the White House staff use their position to exert pressure
on his behalf; however, it proves difficult for long standing close friends to
present criticism – leading to presidential
isolation resulting in only few advisers having direct access (this was the
case for Nixon & Reagan)
Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) – largest
& most important agency:
Prepare the budget that President would present to Congress (spending priorities)
Reviews policy proposals, ensuring they are in line with President’s goals
Director – confirmed by the Senate : Shaun Donovan
Prepare the budget that President would present to Congress (spending priorities)
Reviews policy proposals, ensuring they are in line with President’s goals
Director – confirmed by the Senate : Shaun Donovan
The Council of
Economic Advisers – long
term economic planning, aiding other executive departments with long term plans
– Jason Furman
The National Security
Council (NSC) – co-ordinating
foreign/military policy; considerable importance, particularly for Bush in the
aftermath of 9/11 as a result of suspicions between CIA, FBI – assistant to the President, Security Affairs Susan Rice
Departments have
been at the detriment of Presidents – GW Bush set up the Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives because he wanted
to see religious groups to settle disputes
Currently, Obama
has failed to save the Department of Homeland Security from partial shutdown,
as Congress fail to renew it.
Restrictions
on choosing the Cabinet
President
can’t adjust the number of departments, responsibilities or promote his
policies
Heads of departments should have compatible backgrounds with the department
Powerful pressure groups are consulted in the selection of the candidates and will lobby
Should be representative – EGG formula, Ethnic group; Gender; Geographical region
Heads of departments should have compatible backgrounds with the department
Powerful pressure groups are consulted in the selection of the candidates and will lobby
Should be representative – EGG formula, Ethnic group; Gender; Geographical region
Limitations on the
usefulness of the Cabinet
o
Heads
of Department/Cabinet secretaries are usually POLICY specialists and they’re
basically shit in areas unrelated to policy – not as useful in helping the
President make decisions
o
May
lack a close relationship with the President/each other; resulting in lack of
confidential material shared with the cabinet
o
Members
of the Cabinet form strong ties to Congressional committees/pressure groups;
due to the long-term planning that takes place in departments who appear to be
at odds with the President who is in office for a maximum of eight years.
o
Growing
tendency for divided Cabinet – as each Head of Department gets increasingly
committed to their own departmental priorities rather than a shared agenda
o
Friction
between departments due to competition for funds for their programmes
o
Heads
of Departments are accountable to BOTH Congress and the President
Due to these shortcomings, policy
making is often the result of bilateral meetings with the President and the top
tier Cabinet Members for Defence (Ashton Carter), State (John Kerry), Treasury (Jack
Lew) and Justice (Eric Holder).
Usefulness of the Cabinet
·
Embodying
the presidential platform; Bush – campaign theme of compassionate conservatism
·
Being
‘in touch’ – having a representative Cabinet from every corner of American
society. Obama’s first Cabinet was the most racially diverse Cabinet, with
seven women initially.
·
Presenting
an image of open, collective government – Cabinet meetings are photographed;
key decisions are made by people who not subject to Senate ratification
·
Cabinet
is called by the President to discuss major initiatives that affect every
department – including annual budget
·
Cabinet
meetings give opportunity for a check on legislation, information exchange –
enforcing a sense of coherence, particularly if the administration is going
through political turbulence.
How
important is the Cabinet?
Yes, the
Cabinet has importance
|
No, the
EXOP has more importance
|
Cabinet
members in charge of huge departmental budgets including Health (Burwell),
Defence (Carter), Justice (Holder), State (Kerry) have colossal amounts of
importance, due to the significance of their departments
|
However,
the EXOP is in charge of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) so
the Council of Economic Advisers, under Furman is of similar
importance.
|
The
Cabinet is of more importance as the EXOP need not be confirmed – which means
the EXOP can get too close and will not give honest feedback. The EXOP
becomes sycophantic and will then fail to see political
realities outside the presidential/EXOP bubble. Depletes the effectiveness
& power of the president
|
EXOP are
the close political allies, who would see the President every single day,
giving them greater importance on the day to day dealings. Contrastingly,
Clinton’s cabinet didn’t meet more than three times in a year while he was in
power – suggesting the distance and the spatial leadership he
exerted
|
Individual
cabinet members are extremely powerful alone – pushing their significance in
their respective departments, particularly in court cases. For instance
Shelby
County v Holder
Hobby
Lobby v Burwell
Pinpointing
on them and giving them a greater media influence
|
The EXOP
are likely to be the president’s allies – whereas within the Cabinet, if a
Secretary of State was to fall out with the President they would lose their
job emphasising the greater importance of the EXOP.
Chuck
Hagel lost his Defence post as a result of poor
dealings over what to do about ISIS. Hagel was subsequently replaced by
Carter. Sebelius fell out with Obama for the poor reception of the
HealthCare.org, and he felt she wasn’t pulling her weight. Sebelius was
subsequently replaced by Burwell.
|
Cabinet
must be confirmed – through senatorial courtesy trials. Hagel for instance,
was filibustered for his position in defence during these trials. The Cabinet
must be selected through the EGG formula.
|
The EXOP
has more powerful politicians who have greater experience in their fields and
in political office – the crème de la crème is selected for positions in the
EXOP.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment