1865
– end of the American Civil War, 13th Amendment (slavery)
The end of the American civil war marked the
abolition of slavery, something strongly opposed by the Democratic Party. The 13th
Amendment was passed under Lincoln, the Republican President and at the time,
the North supported the Republicans, being generally more liberal and not
having slavery in Northern States, generally. the South, was solidly Democratic
and pro-slavery so its abolishment was a blow for the party and Southern slave
owners.
1868
- 14th Amendment – gave African Americans citizenship
Everyone, regardless of race (but excluding the
Native Americans) who was born or naturalised in the USA would be given
citizenship. Again this was something the Democratic Party heavily opposed, including
the president Andrew Johnson who vetoed the bill. Congress, however, overruled
them as it was dominated by Republicans despite the Southern Democratic states
who refused to accept the 14th Amendment. Here it becomes clear
which party was unionist (Republican) and which was confederate (Democrat).
Dual
Federalism / layer cake federalism
·
State – everything apart from foreign
and interstate affairs
·
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
gave states the permission to enforce segregation laws/Jim Crow if they wished
·
The Supreme Court struck down laws
passed by Congress to regulate business & working conditions – the Supreme
Court deemed this unconstitutional and these laws only applied to inter-state
commerce
·
the
power of states over local matters may be eliminated and…our system of
government destroyed’
Co-Operative
Federalism – the
new relationship of co-operative federalism was more like
two different mixtures contributing to marble
cake federalism
·
New
Deal – provided financial help for the unemployed
·
Schechter
Poultry Corporation v. US (1935) Regulated all companies
including local trade, which was state responsibility
·
US
v. Butler (1936) the court ruled the Agricultural
Adjustment Act was unconstitutional as it interfered with state responsibility
·
The federal government rose to take
responsibility for local schools, work/unemployment benefits – which was a
major departure from traditional federalism
The
New Deal destroyed Federalism.
Co-Operative
federalism continued because the government needed to control the economy
during WWII and after to take care of the aftermath of those who served &
were wounded by war.
|
Gideon
v Wainwright (1963) – defendants were entitled to a
lawyer even if they couldn’t afford it, due to the 6th Amendment
Miranda
v. Arizona (1966) – suspects had to be informed of their
rights to not incriminate themselves (silence), 5th Amendment
|
1929
- The Great Depression
1929 saw the biggest American economic depression
which spread through every country America had loaned to. For the Democrats,
its aftermath meant a huge shift in support; FDR’s socially progressive
policies and ideas of Keynesian economics meant an unexpected surge of support
from the North. The South becomes Republican. This marked the difference
between the two parties; the Democrats started to step away from conservatism
as African Americans benefitted from FDR’s Keynesian economic policies and the
New Deal.
1945
– 1990 – The Cold War
The Cold War was a
period of conflict between the USA and Russia. The Democrat president at the
time, Truman was anti-communist and it seemed opposition to the threat of
communism was consensus in American politics. The Cold War didn’t officially
end until the Berlin Wall collapsed in 1991; after which Russia becomes
tentative allies with America. However,
Romney made the mistake of referring to Russia as their number one enemy, a
weakness pointed out by Obama at the National Party Convention speech.
·
During
the Cold War, the US was a major technological player in arms and provided a
vast array of jobs in the economy.
Federal government rose as the key player, taking away state power.
1954
- Brown v. Board of Education (Topeka)
Oliver Brown brought about this case when his
daughter wasn’t allowed to attend a school close to her home because it was all
white. The case ruled in Brown’s favour and ordered the desegregation of
schools with all deliberate speed, something
the Southern states took to mean an indefinite delay. Furthermore, Eisenhower
was a Republican and wasn’t keen on the Brown v. Board decision, privately
calling the appointment of Chief Justice, Earl Warren the biggest damn fool mistake I’d ever made. It was for these
reasons that desegregation wasn’t enforced until over ten years later and that
was with the difficulty experienced by Kennedy to persuade the Republican
Congressmen to pass the Act.
1955
– 1975 - Vietnam War
The Vietnam War lasted 20 years as part of the Cold War.
It was an issue the two parties seemed to mostly agree on, hence the very quick
ratification of the 26th Amendment – giving 18 year olds the vote;
where before, voters had to be 21.
1963
- Kennedy’s assassination
Kennedy’s assassination meant a change to Democratic
policy as his successor, Lyndon B Johnson wanted to pursue the Great Society
programme – taking policies even more left wing than the New Deal programme. The
Great Society aimed to eliminate poverty from specific groups but this effort
had to come from the federal government. The federal government would have to
fund, coordinate and be committed to such a huge scheme – this meant a change
in the nature of federalism as specific groups were targeted, bypassing state
law and intervening with local government. The federal government also dictated
how much money states could spend on certain things known as categorical grants.
1964
- 24th Amendment
Lyndon B Johnson pushed through the 24th
Amendment, outlawing poll tax and other obstacles of voting for black people. This
also demonstrates the steps taken to move away from social conservatism and
instead being more progressive. LBJ also proved to be very liberal in this
respect, both by furthering the Civil Rights Movement and through the Great
Society. Widening the electorate affected every state – displaying the power of
federal government over state government, as only Southern states had poll
taxes, literacy tests. The Shelby County
decision rejects Section 4b of the Voting Rights Act and gives the states to
use said “preventative procedures” by discretion of the state
Johnson
and Creative Federalism
·
Federal
government
·
Great
Society – aimed to alleviate poverty; only federal government
would have the resources for such a large programme that would take significant
commitment in areas including; healthcare for the elderly, inner city
unemployment, housing, education, transport
The gates of opportunity speech paved the way for government programmes like Affirmative Action.
·
Direct federal support; block grants changed the nature of
federalism
·
Financial support for local government bypassing state
government; constitutionally, the local government is accountable to state
government which changed the dynamic of federalism completely.
·
Categorical
grants; given for specific purposes – the state couldn’t put
the money to any other use
·
Federal government dictating how money
was spent by states changed the nature of Federalism. Effects of Great Society – the amount of money spent by federal
government on welfare for citizens rose dramatically
1972
– 1974 - Watergate
Watergate was the scandal in the 1970s regarding
political corruption and issues with campaign finance. Republican President,
Nixon’s advisors had paid people with campaign funds to break into the Democrat
headquarters and investigate their campaign strategy. It was also revealed that
Nixon’s relationships with those donating to him were questionable all of which
brought great controversy to the Republicans. This scandal was investigated by
the Senate and led to Nixon’s resignation.
Nixon
and New Federalism
·
State government
·
Nixon attempted to bring back federalism
in its purest form. Nixon attempted to reverse the effects of the Great Society
which he believed completely destroyed federalism.
·
Whilst Nixon attempted to pass the
federal power down to the states, the Supreme Court continued to insist on
Federal standards being applied to state laws and actions
·
General
Revenue Sharing – categorical grants replaced by block
grants for states to spend
1973
- Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade took away Texas’s state laws that
restricted abortion on the basis that it contradicted the 9th
Amendment. This was something conservatives to this day feel incredibly
strongly about, as shown by Todd Akin remarks “the female body has
mechanisms to get rid of the baby conceived from rape” in defence of being
pro-life. The Republicans are very pro-life as seen by Sarah Palin and Romney
as well and Reagan as a Republican gave back the right for states to
restrict abortion to some extent. However, the Democrats are very pro-choice and this can be seen by Wendy Davis’ filibuster preventing
legislation in Texas restricting abortion and closing many abortion clinics
down.
1981
– 1989 - Reagan’s presidency
Reagan
and New Federalism
·
State government
·
-Issued Executive Order to favour the
interests of the states over federal
government when policy making
·
-By reducing federal aid to states, he
broke dependency culture (reducing $18billion)
·
-Instead of federal & state
government sharing responsibility, the states would take FULL responsibility of
2/3 programmes (Medicaid, welfare/food stamps) and federal government would be
responsible for the third. This was known as SWAPS – and whilst this seemed a
feasible proposal, the states simply couldn’t afford such a programme
·
Appointed Anthony Kennedy who shared the
view that the judiciary should restrain Congress in interfering with in state
affairs/problems
Reagan famously said government is not the solution to our problem; government is the
problem. He was a conservative
and wanted to reduce federal power first by voting on an executive order to
favour the states interests over federal interests when it came to policy. Federal
aid to states was reduced and became the responsibility of the state, mostly to
provide welfare. So while the Republicans were New Federalists wanting an EQUAL balance of power between the
federal government and the state, the Democrats wanted more federal power
following the presidency of FDR.
Clinton
and New Federalism
·
Clinton felt, as a previous governor,
states should have freedom to decide what was best for states, which was
enhanced by the growing professionalism state governments possessed. State
government
·
US
v. Lopez (1995) – Congress had exceeded powers when it
passed banning firearms near schools; this could only be passed by states;
·
Printz
v. US (1997) – background checks could not be enforced
by Congress as this was for states to instruct
·
1960s: local/state electors declined, as
most wanted to be in Washington.
·
1990s: this reversed and state
politicians cooperated with one another
·
Economic boom leading to an increase in
tax revenues for states and less reliance on Federal government income
1994
- Contact with America
Contract with America refers to the plot by the Republicans
to take control of the House of Representatives during the 1994 congressional
election, led by Newt Gingrich and Richard Armey. This document outlined what
the Republicans would do if they had a majority in the House – what would be a
majority for the first time in 40 years. It also detailed specific legislation
concerning shrinking the size of government, lowering taxes and welfare reform.
To the Democrats dismay, the Republicans won their majority in the House
meaning more allowance to socially conservative legislation. The Contract with
America was likely part of the reason Bush was able to invade Iraq with the
growth of neo-conservatism, and a more nationalised agenda.
1998
Clinton’s impeachment
Bill Clinton was very much popular and nationally
favoured as a president. The Monica Lewinsky scandal tainted his image greatly.
Kenneth Starr, Independent Counsel was appointed in 1994 and investigated Clinton’s
sexual misconduct at great lengths, where he was tried by the Senate and
acquitted of both charges; lying under oath and obstruction of justice.
2000
election
The 2000 election beckoned a winner who received fewer popular votes but more Electoral
College votes. It was also heavily contested because of the issues with
Florida’s results. Originally, TV broadcasts projected Gore as the President
and then they changed to Bush, before back to Gore. Gore demanded a recount –
which was taken to the Supreme Court. Because the majority were conservative
judges, they all voted to stop the recount and declare Bush the winner because
he was Republican. This made the Democrats look ineffective, in light of the
Monica Lewinsky scandal; as Al Gore was Vice President at the time.
George
W Bush and New Federalism
·
State government
·
Fiscal conservative agenda; if taxes
were cut national government would be forced to do less & people would rely
on their own resources. Starving the
Beast would strengthen state governments and ensure personal responsibility
·
-9/11 federal government was given
additional funds to spent on reconstruction of New York City; new government
department set up for Homeland Security
·
INTERVENTIONIST INSTINCTS:
·
-No
Child Left Behind – federal government’s contribution to the cost of
education. Introduced the federal system of accountability for schools not
meeting English, Maths, Science criteria
·
-Hurricane
Katrina: serious damage to New Orleans – Bush committed to rebuild the city
2001
9/11 bombings
The attacks on the World Trade Centre meant an
economic recession as well as an intense feeling of fear through America. The stock
markets had already collapsed and business failing meant less tax paid and less
tourist revenue. The government of America continued to spend, reconstructing New
York funding the Afghanistan invasion and creating a new Homeland Security
invasion. This seemed to go against Bush’s proposed fiscal conservatism due to
factors beyond his control.
2006
Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Katrina further challenged Bush’s so
called fiscal conservatism and
illustrated him very much as a compassionate
conservative. There was serious question raised over the rebuilding of New
Orleans. New Orleans was in a vulnerable location and below sea level but Bush
pledged to rebuild it. Congress investigated why the mainly African-American
community were not better protected – with nine committees making reports and
recommendations, which the Republicans were criticised for.
2006
6 for 06
1.
Honest
leadership and open government
2.
Real
security – deployment of US forces from Iraq, and
doubling the size of US military officials to capture Bin Laden and destroy al
Qaeda.
3.
Energy
independence – end to American dependence on foreign nations
for fuel.
4.
Economic
prosperity – ending congressional pay rise until minimum
wage is raised
5.
Educational
excellence – extend federal grants
6.
Healthcare
and retirement security
The Democrats wanted six key policy themes that
eventually won them the control of the Senate. The Republicans still had
control of the House which is why it’s so hard to enforce gun control – a majority
when the Republicans dominate the House.
2008
DC v. Heller
Highly controversial case regarding firearms for
traditionally lawful reasons, like self defence, at home. It was the first
Supreme Court case in history to ascertain whether or not the Second Amendment
allows bearing arms for self defence and they voted 5-4 in favour striking down
provisions saying guns were unconstitutional as well as regulations requiring
all shotguns and rifles being unloaded.
2008
Lehman Brother’s collapse
The Lehman Brothers collapse marked the beginning of
the recession and impacted the Republican Party badly because of how McCain
reacted to the recession refusing to continue his campaign in attempt to retain
his campaigns strength. However, Obama kept his cool and rather calmly dealt
with the situation demonstrating the ability to concentrate on multiple issues
at one – which illustrates his ability as president.
Obama
and Federalism
·
Federal government growing on a gargantuan level - tipping the balance in favour of federal government.
- Fisher v Texas (2013) – voided the Grutter decision and made Affirmative Action unconstitutional in Texas, in favour of the state
- US v. Windsor (2013) – against Congress, struck down the part of DOMA that prohibited federal benefits to homosexual couples
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) – refused to hear case on same sex marriage, which reinstated same sex marriage in California.
- Shelby County v. Holder – invalidated Section 4b of the Voting Rights Act; permitting the states to decide their own voting procedures. This was a win for the ANTI-FEDERALISTS!!!
- National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius – that insurance exchanges under Obamacare were unconstitutional as they didn’t have the individual mandates to force the states in providing healthcare insurance. Congress couldn’t collect taxes under the Commerce Clause, making the coercion of states to buy healthcare insurance completely unconstitutional
- Obamacare – Affordable Care Act meant that the federal government was maintaining the role of the state by paying for welfare
- Obama Stimulus Package – economy was in absolute shambles, collapse of the Lehman Brothers. Economic stimulus bill of $787billion dollars
0 comments:
Post a Comment