Showing posts with label ted cruz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ted cruz. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Is moderate conservatism in decline?

'Moderate Conservatism is a declining force in the Republican Party.' Discuss. 

Moderate conservatives within the Republican Party tend to lean towards the centre-right on many issues such as social policy by supporting gay marriage, women's right to an abortion and at times advocating comprehensive immigration reform, a more centrist stance is also evident on economic policy. Moderates are a dying breed within the GOP, which has become increasingly polarised in recent years due to the emergence of the Tea Party Movement which has moved the party further to the right. The fact two moderates, John McCain and Mitt Romney, failed to win in 2008 and 2012 respectively and faced heavy criticism from their party and that the 2016 race seems dominated by hardline conservatives, illustrates the fact moderates are indeed a declining force.

The 2008 and 2012 presidential elections illustrated the fact that moderate conservatism is a declining force within the Republican Party. John McCain was accused by the GOP for being too moderate according to his voting record and his 2008 plans, while campaigning, for a complete complete overhaul of the immigration system was criticised by the OGP for being a 'sneaky' attempt at granting amnesty to illegal immigrants. Similarly, Mitt Romney was also slammed by his own party as being a 'weak moderate candidate' handpicked by the 'mushy-middle' GOP. The very fact these two candidates faced a considerable amount of backlash from their own political party illustrates the fact that the GOP themselves are killing off moderates within their own path. However, the opposing view is that moderates are not in decline given the fact that the past two Republican candidates were moderates in the presidential election, showing that moderate views are not in decline. Other candidates who were backed by the Tea Party in 2012 such as Herman Cain, Michele Bachman or Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul from the Libertarian wing failed to make any significant gains shows that moderates remain the overall dominant wing of the party. However, this trend has reversed and it seems the GOP are unable to win a presidential election on moderate policies, and thus the 2016 presidential race seems to have squeezed moderates out of the competition and the hopeful candidates are hardline fiscal conservatives, some from the Tea Party such as Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, emphasising the fact moderate conservatism is in decline.

Looking at the current GOP members who have announced their intentions to run for the 2016 presidential race, there is not a single moderate candidate amongst them who stands a chance at becoming a nominee. The 'top' candidates running are mainly hardline fiscal or social (or both) conservatives such as Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Huckabee or Marco Rubio, who was very recently abandoned by the moderates in the GOP. The fact that the GOP presidential race is dominated by conservatives highlights the premise that moderates are in fact in decline. On the other hand, although Jeb Bush has not yet announced his candidacy, according to the New York Times he most likely will. A recent article by the New York Times has suggested that Bush would stand in a position to consolidate the moderate wing of the GOP. Moderates play a bigger role in the GOP primaries process than they do in Washington and it will take an incredibly strong candidate to defeat a moderate like Bush who has a huge advantage among moderates. The reason moderates appear in decline and under represented in Congress is because most come from Blue states and thus, lose in general elections but in the primary process it's a completely different story. 2012 and 2008 exit polls showed moderates represent about 40% of the vote in most blue state primaries - its important to note moderate therefore are very often state governors rather than members of Congress. Conservative opposition to Bush don't have it easy as the right of the party is crowded by candidates with broad and factional appeal like Cruz and Paul, and thus it's likely Bush will consolidate moderates in the party showing that moderates are not in decline. However, indeed Bush's candidacy may lead to a revival of moderate activism, but today the GOP is heavily dominated by fiscal conservatives from the Tea Party and moderates have virtually gone extinct.

The rise and dominance of the Tea Party Movement has consolidated fiscal sentiments within the GOP, thereby squeezing out the moderates. Moderates have further declined due to the Tea Party through Republican primaries in which moderates have been targeted. Moderates have been referred to as Republicans In Name Only (RINOs), plunging the GOP into a civil war in which moderates have specifically been targeted leading to several moderates casualties like Charlie Crist who lost to Marco Rubio, Senator Lisa Murkowski lost to a favourable Tea Party candidate Joe Miller and Bob Bennett from Utah was denied his fourth term by the Tea Party. As the Tea Party have gradually wiped out RINOs in the party the moderates have declined and fiscal sentiments have been enforced within the GOP which is perhaps most evident from the 2015 budget approved by the GOP dominated Congress. The budget itself is as fiscal as fiscal gets, introducing a balanced budget with $5.3 trillion in cuts making it easier to repeal Obamacare, demonstrating how fiscal conservatives dominate the party. Although the Tea Party have indeed won over many moderates, moderates have also put up a fight in the most recent primaries with critics and journalists arguing that the Tea Party lost the 2014 Republican primaries. North Carolina's House Speaker, Tom Tillis, a notable moderate, successfully beat several more conservative candidates than himself and he was also endorsed by Je Bush, Mitt Romney and the U.S Chamber of Commerce and American Crossroads who spent $2.6 million on Tillis. Other casualties were experienced by the Tea Party in Ohio and Indiana which illustrates that moderates remain active in the party. However, such victories are minor compared to the major losses endured by the moderates in previous elections which also highlights that at a time of increasing polarisation, moderates are no longer popular among the electorate.

Social conservatism is another powerful element within the GOP (often working in conjunction with fiscal conservatism) and with Congress now a GOP stronghold, social conservatives have become increasingly rampant on a range of social issues. This was seen recently in the House of Representatives by Republican attempts at pushing forward legislation instructing doctors performing late term abortions to take the best possible steps to ensure the survival of the foetus, which is all a part of wider GOP attempts to criminalise all abortions starting at the 20th week of pregnancy. The moderates, however, are no where to be seen as their influence against such measures are ineffective, emphasising how moderates are weak in the 114th Congress. However, as Bill O'Reilly from Fox News said recently, 'its a tough time for social conservatives in America' who are in the 'smear-zone', pointing to key figures like Scott Walker and Marco Rubio who have faced major backlash from the public for their tough stance on social issues. This is because social conservatives, as John McCain famously said, 'are agents of intolerance' in a time when societal attitudes towards issues like gay marriage are evolving. With key Republican figures like Jeb Bush endorsing same-sex marriage and the Supreme Court ruling in favour of it through U.S v Windsor, Hollingsworth v. Perry and the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, it is the social conservatives who have declined where as moderate views on social policy has become more largely accepted. However, the vast majority of the Republican Party remain in stark opposition to issues like gay marriage and continue to have a strict stance on social issues in spite of societal attitudes changing.

Finally, moderate conservatives believe in having fewer restrictions on legal immigration, tend to support comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship. However, as demonstrated by Republican position to Democrat attempts at comprehensive immigration reform, moderate sentiments on immigration reform are declining. This was evident fem opposition to Obama's executive order in November 2014 which sought to aid five million illegal immigrants and previous Democrat efforts to reintroduce the DREAM Act. Clearly the GOP have adopted a hard and strict stance on immigration, which is also evident at state level. For instance, Republican Arizona passed SB 1070 into law which is today known for being the strictest anti-immigration bill giving law enforcement more powers to check people's immigration status with 'reasonable suspicion' and a range of other measures. However, perhaps at national level the moderates have indeed gone extinct but at state level they're still very active, which was evident earlier this year in the Texas legislature when attempts were made to restrict immigration heavily (such as by limiting sanctuary cities). However, the bills were met with gridlock in the Texas House and Senate following heavy opposition from moderates. Moreover, moderates were also seen to be active in Washington recently after John House Speaker John Boehner (who's been criticised for being too moderate) along with dozens other Republicans and Democrats attempted to pass a 3 week extension bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security, allowing for Obama's executive order to proceed. Although the bill failed and a shorter one-week extension was passed instead, this bill gained a lot of media attention and it highlighted how moderates remain active within the GOP. Although they may remain active on certain issues, the moderates have virtually gone extinct and are no longer as influential as they used to be.

As demonstrated above, the Republican Party have crushed their moderate wing in recent years through primaries and increasing polarisation which has shifted the party further to the right. Moderates within the GOP are no longer active at national level in Washington but are more popular at state level and it will someone like Jeb Bush to reconsolidate the moderate wing of the party.

Sunday, 17 May 2015

Divisions within the Democratic and Republican Party

Republican Party
The 2012 primaries revealed huge divisions within the GOP. Mitt Romney ran for Presidency, he came off as a very moderate conservative in which the Tea Party slammed Romney as a ‘weak moderate candidate’ who was hand picked by the ‘mushy-middle’ GOP. Further candidates from different factions: Rick Santorum (social) and Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul (Libertarians) ran for the primaries but made no significant gains, the fact that so many candidates from different factions were running emphasising the very fact that the GOP are not dominated by one faction but there are many conflicting ones seeking to gain control. 

With certain provisions of the PATRIOT Act set to expire soon, divisions have emerged among the Republicans on whether or not to renew the PATRIOT Act. Civil libertarians are at odds with traditional defence hawks who back tough spying measures to fight terror. The divisions have most prominently become evident on the PATRIOT Act in response to Edward Snowden’s NSA leaks which revealed the extent of mass surveillance operations conducted by the NSA involving collecting internet data from and tapping phones from millions of citizens. On one side we have Senator Marco Rubio who wants to reauthorize the law believes it to be necessary given the growing threat of global terror, particularly the threat of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and al-Qaeda. Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, however, have spoken against it saying that the PATRIOT Act infringes upon citizens right to privacy. Rand Paul said that the federal government and NSA want to trace every detail and aspect of peoples lives and use it to control people. Paul has also threatened to filibuster the expansion and renewal of the PATRIOT Act. John McCain, also in support of the PATRIOT Act believes it should be renewed, pointing to the ‘draw Mohammed’ competition whereby two Islamic extremists were gunned down, in order to prevent terrorism and especially homegrown extremism. .  Moreover, divisions are also clear on strategy on how to deal with ISIS. For instance, Rick Santorum wants to deploy 10,000 American troops in Iraq as part of a coalition with Arab nations to fight ISIS. Jeb Bush believes those troops would have been useful few years ago but today ground troops won’t help. Marco Rubio has adopted a tough stance, taking a line from Taken and saying “we will look for you, we will find you, and we will kill you” and provide the most devastating air support available. Scott Walker and Rick Perry are in favour of a combat missions while Rand Paul only wants Arab boots on the ground.  


More divisions within the Republican Party have recently been evident from the recent stripping of a bill which allowed for young illegal immigrants to serve in the United States military. The divisions have come from GOP members of Congress who are anti-immigration and GOP members who represent districts with large Hispanic populations. The bill was defeated by a 221-202 vote. In total 20 Republicans sided with the Democrats in opposing the amendment to the bill which came from Mo Brooks (Senator from Alabama). This isn’t the first time divisions have emerged within the GOP over immigration, earlier ones date back to the Gang of 8 Bill which was a bipartisan bill which was introduced by Republicans and Democrats, proposing a path to citizenship. Republicans have called the party to soften its tone on immigration to make it a more competitive force in elections with 56% of Republicans saying their party is not doing a good job on immigration. When Democrat Hilary Clinton discussed her stance on immigration (seeking comprehensive reform, path to citizenship, etc) several Republicans such as Scott Walker and Ted Cruz spoke out against it while Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio made no comments.  

As a polarising force in Washington, the Tea Party Movement has caused major divisions within the Republican Party. The Tea Party have been targeting and scrutinizing Republicans who they don’t seem fit, such as John Boehner whom they have criticised as being a ‘leader without followers’ and being too moderate. The Tea Party have been winning seats from key Republican figures such as Eric Cantor (former House Majority leader in 2014) who was defeated by Tea Party challenger Dave Brat. 


There's also obvious divisions with attitudes towards social issues such as the death penalty, gay marriage and abortion. The Christian Right or, social conservatives have lost the battle against gay marriage as illustrated by US v. Windsor, Hollingsworth v. Perry and the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, more Republicans are becoming increasingly more tolerant of gay marriage. For instance, Jeb Bush has spoken out in support of gay marriage and Ted Cruz although he opposes it, said he will still love his daughter if she were gay. Marco Rubio, in response to the Obergefell v. Hodges case has argued that it is ridiculous to assume that gay marriage is a right provided by the constitution and has remained in stark opposition to gay marriage. Also, divisions have emerged at state level in Nebraska with fiscal and social conservatives along with Libertarians from the Republicans seeking to ban capital punishment. 17 Republicans in the Nebraska House legislature advocated for passage of an abolition bill, the bill passed its first hurdle with a 30 to 12 vote in favour of abolishing the death penalty, however more conservative Republicans are threatening to filibuster and the governor (Pete Ricketts) is threatening to a veto. 

Democratic Party

Most recent development in divisions within the Democrats comes from Senate Democrats blocking a bill granting Obama 'fast track authority' he needs to negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement which would include 12 countries representing about 40% of the world economy. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has become de facto Democrat leader in the Senate, opposed the bill because she believes Obama cannot be trusted to make a deal in the interests of American workers as previous trade pacts have not effectively enforced existing labor standards. The 52-45 vote was a sign of bitter divisions within the party over the economy. Democrats have been long suspicious of trade deals blaming them for job losses and lax enforcement. Harry Reid also sided with Warren. Right now, all Obama can do is pretty much hope that Republicans deliver the vote given the fact they agree with the president on trade and almost every 2016 presidential candidate, except Mike Huckabee, supports TPP. Republican leaders in Congress and corporate lobby groups, particularly the U.S. Chamber of Commerce support giving the President fast track authority while most congressional Democrats, along with Labour unions, environmental groups and advocates of Internet freedom oppose it.


 TO BE UPDATED...
Last edited 26/05/2015